Before addressing the Festival of the Event called the Annunciation,
we need to address the often forgettable Feast of Saint Joseph occurring two
days after Saint Patrick’s Day. It is, in the eyes of the Churches, a much more
important day than the one two days earlier, a great feast that has been
eclipsed by Patrick.
Joseph suffers
the fate of being a saint who is, technically, very important but also stripped
of the charisma other, arguably lesser, saint possess. There are certainly some
who have been incredibly dedicated to him. I live in a county in northern Indiana with his name, by
a river with his name, in the shadow of a tripartite religious congregation
dedicated to him. But in the end even that congregation named their two
colleges around here Notre Dame and Saint Mary’s, after his wife, and the name
of St. Joseph slides so blandly off the tongue that despite the two churches, their
accompanying schools, the high school, the river, the county we live in, the
largest hospital in the area all bearing his name, still, no one thinks of him.
Joseph is,
like it or not, a placeholder. Popes stick him in the place of other things and
this is why he is important. The patron Saint of Workers, to balance against
the communist Day of the Worker, he was given another Feast Day, May the First,
and for any witch, this is noteworthy. May is the Month given to Mary, the
Goddess as Virgin and Mother simultaneously. More on this later. The first day of
that month is hers, but it is called for Joseph the Worker. In Orthodoxy and
Catholicism, the first Sunday after Christmas is either his day or the day
focused on him, a strange focus since neither in conception nor actual labor
did he have anything to do with Christ.
And now, on the Eve of the Equinox, the day is his as well.
Joseph has always been problematic
in Christianity. The Gospels list he and Mary as having several children. Both the
Orthodox and the Catholics, at great pains to swear upon an eternal (and
unnecessary) virginity for the Mother of God, took care to portray these other
progeny of Joseph and Mary as either being Jesus’s cousins, or his older
siblings from Joseph’s first marriage instead of the younger brothers and sisters
they so clearly are. In addition, to make the idea of Joseph EVER having sex
with his wife more unbelievable, Joseph was portrayed as impossibly old. A
foster father of Jesus who is too young, too attractive, too charismatic is
also too sexual. Up until Protestantism, which is far from the iconographic and
resists the magical, Joseph had to be… unfuckable. So Joseph is wrapped in a
silence which is more bland than mysterious. But what if we restore to Joseph
his sexuality and his youth, his vitality and his power? Some Catholic
portraits to this? What does it say of his relationship to his wife, and his
relationship to God, and Jesus? Can it be that the mystery of Joseph is that he
is a male face for Mary who herself is the Divine Woman as Mother and Virgin?
The Goddess and the God always travel together. To be fully divine one must
encompass the male and the female. Is Joseph, then, quite possibly, the Divine
Man, the Virgin Father, the Shadow of the Father God, the Other Side of the
Lady? Are all of his days shadows on which we could begin to look past the
shallow theology and the vapid icons which tell us so little? When the
sexuality of Joseph is restored, perhaps many other things will be restored.
Perhaps we will look again at how one becomes the Son of God, how the Spirit
conceives and what it means to be a Virgin, but these are weighty opening
questions to entirely new mysteries.
No comments:
Post a Comment